@stuart_w64 If you want to engage with me, please take the time to read what I've already written on the subject and sent you.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @stuart_w64
@stuart_w64 If you would read and understand my post, you would see I am not opposed to narratives being changed and overturned.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @stuart_w64
@stuart_w64 the non-nuclear uses of many of these metals and materials, and make speculatively leaps.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @stuart_w64
@stuart_w64 and I would not expect to find any. Again, distinction between these phases of work is crucial but mostly ignored by the cranks.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
@stuart_w64 As is the distinction between a modest reactor program (which the Germans definitely had) and a bomb production program.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
@stuart_w64 Without criticality, no fission products in concentrations worth speaking of, no dirty bomb.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.