@stuart_w64 If you want to engage with me, please take the time to read what I've already written on the subject and sent you.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
@stuart_w64 and I would not expect to find any. Again, distinction between these phases of work is crucial but mostly ignored by the cranks.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@stuart_w64 Need evidence of relevant documents being locked away, it cannot just be a thing to gesture at when you find it convenient.
End of conversation
-
-
-
@stuart_w64 As is the distinction between a modest reactor program (which the Germans definitely had) and a bomb production program. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@stuart_w64 You would still need a much more advanced reactor program than there is any evidence for. No evidence they achieved criticality. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@stuart_w64 It leaves traces in the environment (huge amounts of waste and tailings), it releases isotopes into the air and water. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@stuart_w64 Just another entry into the "bad journalism" file. Daily Mail is not reliable even for quotations on this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@stuart_w64 The historical and technical difficulty of the subject matter in my opinion a prior rules out likely advances from amateurs. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@stuart_w64 But he's not a historian, and makes blunders left and right. Knowing some physics is only half of the relevant expertise.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.