Any idea why this law, barring patents on nuclear weapons technology, was passed? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2181 …
-
-
Replying to @SteveBellovin
@SteveBellovin My first guess is that patents are PUBLIC, and “we” didn’t want to make the technology public.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveBellovin
@SteveBellovin@Berry_k I'm guessing A. hey didn't want to set up a whole nother secret patent court system. and 1/21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marshray
@SteveBellovin@Berry_k B. With the USG as the main buyer they didn't see any benefit from granting monopolies on tech.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marshray
@marshray@SteveBellovin@Berry_k Ironic since Leo Szilard held a patent on chain reactions and (along with Fermi) on neutron reactors3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @randomoracle
@randomoracle@SteveBellovin@marshray@Berry_k Not ironic — they passed it to thwart private ownership (and control) by people like Szilard1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
@wellerstein@randomoracle@marshray@Berry_k And as I recall, Szilard did indeed attempt to use his patent to gain a policy voice.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveBellovin
@SteveBellovin@randomoracle@marshray@Berry_k They also wanted Szilard's patents to use against French (Joliot's) patent claims.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
@wellerstein@randomoracle@marshray@Berry_k Ah—I hadn’t known about that one. Definitely have to add that to my class slides for next time2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@SteveBellovin @randomoracle @marshray @Berry_k The whole patent thing is one of the weirder, less known aspects of the history of the bomb.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.