In 1963, Kennedy admin. contemplated 3,500' deep underground bunker to withstand multiple direct hits of 200-300 MT.pic.twitter.com/CgheGbVnnH
@SchwartzCNS Where is this from? (NSA?) I'm tying to remember if I've seen this or not.
-
-
@wellerstein LBJ Library (http://coldwar-c4i.net/DUCC/index.html ), but@scottcarson1957 tweeted last week. Good overview here - http://atomic-skies.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-nations-cockpit.html ….Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wellerstein I'm trying to decipher the handwritten note top right. As best I can tell, it reads:pic.twitter.com/CgJ62gX6xp
-
@SchwartzCNS Here are those redacted lines, which I removed by... magic. (NSA has a different copy, no handwriting.)pic.twitter.com/WjbfsoOmik
-
@wellerstein Great! Was speculating with@scottcarson1957 about what was under there. I guessed Mt. Weather (aka High Point) and Greenbrier. -
@SchwartzCNS
@scottcarson1957 Clearly banking on low accuracy, non-penetrating Soviet missiles. -
@wellerstein@scottcarson1957 Even so, what survives topside after "multiple direct hits of 200 to 300 MT weapons bursting at the surface"? -
@SchwartzCNS
@scottcarson1957 Not very much — even if we were just talking about 100 Mt weapons:http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?t=eec212f04dc151a5b2ab5a0826678407 … -
@wellerstein@scottcarson1957 Right. So in the end, DUCC made about as much sense as "Duck and Cover." -
@SchwartzCNS
@scottcarson1957 I think "Duck and Cover" actually made much more sense in its context. Cheap way to save a lot of lives.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.