Third: The actual leaflets had to be written, approved, and translated (by Japanese POW officers). This was done on August 8th. By midnight August 8th, they had the text, the leaflet paper, and were ready to go...pic.twitter.com/AqGukhOO6e
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The fact that there was no warning in the case of Hiroshima/Nagasaki just makes this argument all the more ridiculous. It'd bad reasoning even if it HAD happened — but it DIDN'T happen. Which makes it something of a farce.
I always tell people who spout this: look, one CAN make arguments in favor of the Hiroshima bombing (and Nagasaki, too, but it gets harder). All arguments for and against are contentious, but they can be made. But don't base your argument on something that 100% didn't happen!
(And before people get on me: I know there are other myths/spin/lies/misconceptions, including big ones. But this is the one that bugs me the most, because it 100% didn't happen. There's no real room for interpretive dispute here — it's just false.) /THREAD
I meant to add this, too, but work internet went down: I've written all this up before, some time back. The psychological warfare document from 1946 is linked in the post as a PDF; I got it from the Manhattan Project files in the National Archives. See:http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/04/26/a-day-too-late/ …
He actually did in the 1996 "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places.” Again, it doesn’t justify it or absolve him. But it did happen.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.