In principle, if you think the bombings were necessary, you should still be able to accommodate that belief without ignoring any of the above. In reality, I find most defenders want to look the other way when it comes to the consequences. To do so is to take an incomplete view.
-
-
The most thoughtful Japanese I talked to in Japan read the lesson of Hiroshima like this: Hiroshima shows what happens when you let terrible leaders do terrible things in your name; let's never do that again. I think that's a sentiment that balances both sides of the issue.
-
Ah - "both sides." There's that magic word.
-
(By "both sides," I simply mean, acknowledging the mutual horrors.)
-
Mutual horrors... that the Asians inflicted on the Japanese during WWII?
-
Japan did terrible things to many; and terrible things were done to it. These things can both be true.
-
Nice absence of description of severity there. I guess your argument of flat "everyone's a victim" wouldn't work otherwise. Now excuse me while I go shed tears for the German children Nazi Germany conscripted in defense of Berlin - the true victims of European theater.
-
Oh, what about all those civilians Nazi Germany massacred? Yeah, that's terrible too. Germany did terrible things to many; and terrible things were done to it. These things can both be true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can disagree with the argument, sure. But what's interesting is that you never even entertained the argument, although you entertained the argument of Japanese lives vs American lives. That's what I find interesting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.