I think if the headline were not "top military nominee" and was instead "the guy who would receive any orders Trump issued to use US nuclear weapons" it would have a bit more punch...https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/us/politics/hyten-assault-joint-chiefs.html …
-
-
My read is that this is "he said, she said" except that the "he" in this equation holds power over all possible witnesses. It's hard to imagine any conclusion in such a scenario being very compelling.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
With our whole "presumption of innocence" thing being one of the foundational principles of law in the west, aren't they at least functionally the same?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.