You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Right, but 30% of that would still be "a lot" by any measure. We need better ways to think about these kinds of costs (not just nukes). What opportunities do we lose when we overspend? What else could we be spending that on that would also be worth "a lot"?
(I harp on this because I find the "nukes are actually cheap" line to be so misleading. They're not cheap. Maybe they're worth the cost, maybe it's a necessary cost. But let's not pretend it's cheap. We pay, and have paid, a dear cost for them.)
They're cheap vs. conventional deterrence capabilities. They do drag on resources whe the US military is engaged in conventional-only operations (1991-present) and/or when they're perceived to be unnecessary. Eisenhower 'fought' the MIC with the Nuclear Priesthood!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
