I don’t mean to be flip, but they didn’t need the archive to figure this out. They could have looked it up on Wikipedia.pic.twitter.com/orvSELpWU4
Show this thread
-
2/ Also they could've just googled this from
@ArmsControlWonk, like I just did. None of this is news. Acting like it is...serves another agenda.https://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/202567/uranium-deuteride-initiators/ …Show this thread
I think the fact that they are using MS Paint for this probably indicates it's not actually something all that crucial...
-
-
(Also, isn't this a year old at this point?? Netanyahu showed this slide in April 2018.)
-
None of this is new!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ISIS has touted that diagram before. It's like Sam Glasstone said at Los Alamos staff member orientation: It used to be classified to draw concentric circles.
-
0 to TS-SCI Sigma in 4 concentric chalk circles on blackboard...
-
Nah. You'd need dimensions and materials for classification.
-
Right. But the Fat Man material and dimensions are on Wikipedia now (and elsewhere before...)
-
Yup. Or someone's claims about them. Which is why you can draw concentric circles and not have them mean anything.
-
...can we go back to using MS Paint for nuwep schematics? Because I’ve been telling people that advances on computing make proliferation easier but if they’re using MS Paint then clearly the benefits are not universal ffs.
-
It's not legit unless it's ASCII artpic.twitter.com/jBYgs3v4dI
-
This is as close as I can come in an emoji:
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is a figure from one of the most important papers in Information Science (Brenda Dervin on sensemaking). I don't really need to say anything else about that, I think.pic.twitter.com/CsdvHFuCAE
-
We take our crap serious.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.