Bob Crease's new book asks how we can get back to trusting science #histsci #trustinsciencehttps://go.nature.com/2JyMEuQ
-
I suspect people privately divvy up “science” such that you would have a lot of people who have confidence in science but not in certain fields to live up to what they regard as scientific standards.
Yeah. I have had a lot of conversations that have led me to think that when people say "science" they mean a radically different set of ideas depending on the context (even STSers). It's not the best-defined term despite it being invoked frequently.
-
-
It’s not even definable as a term.
-
Well, sure, but I mean, not in a demarcation-problem sense, just "what people mean when they talk about science more generally" sense. I think one could parse out maybe 4-5 common "meanings" that are separate from the demarcation problem issues.
-
Separately: I recently read Collin's "Are we all scientific experts now?" and was kind of amazed that after what I thought was a pretty good taxonomy of "expertises," in the end he literally just goes to Merton to solve the demarcation problem at the heart of his question.
-
I had the chance to ask him once who adjudicates the assignment of expertises and he said sociologists, which suggested to me he hadn’t really thought the matter through.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.