Minor observation from teaching: when I ask my students (mostly engineers) how many of them like "art," only about half will raise their hands. But if I then add on that "music" is a form of art, I get 100% agreement. I imagine "film" probably would work for this, too.
-
Show this thread
-
I'm sure others have noticed this, but I find it very interesting how they compartmentalize "art" into something that doesn't include music, film, and so on. And how they react very poorly to the idea of liking "art" by itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
In other discussions, they'll indicate that they think "art" is kind of pointless, unless you include music, and then they agree it has value, both to them, and to the broader culture.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
I don't really know what to make of all of this, but I find it kind of interesting. I can't tell if it's an engineer thing, or a teenager thing, or a class thing, or what. (Or a college male thing, since the majority are men.)
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
(Or a highbrow/lowbrow thing, etc. Many possible variables that could be chopped up and thought about.)
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @wellerstein
How about this explanation: Today's "art" is lousy and fraudulent and doesn't deserve to be liked.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Except "art" includes lots of things that people think have high value, like music, film, etc. So you're making the same cognitive error as the students, by meaning a very specific thing by "art" (e.g., "high concept gallery art" or something like that).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.