The main problem with a US pledge of No First Use of nuclear weapons is simple: none of our adversaries would believe it.https://twitter.com/Leone_EXM/status/1090654031129788421 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @NarangVipin
I have to admit (as you've heard me say) that I think the NFU issue is kind of a MacGuffin. It's something that takes up a lot of mental bandwidth but I'm not sure adds up to much, either practically or theoretically. I'm not against it, just not excited by it.
4 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @NarangVipin
Am not quite sure why/if this matters, but
#NFU debate different this time since it’s motivated by self-restraint (executive restraint) not confidence building measures. I think that needs to shape understandings of what, if any, international effect it might have.3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Yeah, it's framed differently. I don't love NFU as the solution to the "crazy President" problem — in part because I'm not sure it's sufficient (I could imagine someone using a nuke, e.g. DPRK or a terrorist, and would still not want the President to use a nuke in response).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.