Okay I'm going to do something slightly unusual here. I'm finishing up my book manuscript right now, ACTIVE MEASURES (http://tinyletter.com/ridt ). One specific set of fact-checking questions is particularly hard—and related to US nuclear targeting in the early 1960s. Bear with me.
-
-
All of which are just food for thought. I will sleep on it a bit. It would be interesting to really plug through all of the coordinates, SAC numbers, etc., and see how they match up with other docs.
-
My current "most plausible to me" theory is that this is a SAC doc used to establish numbers of warheads for weird scenarios they might imagine unfolding. But this is just a theory.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
TS title & summary page, Secret HOB scale to actual, Confidential for rest of narrative (VN stuff) section. Then the actual tables go back to TS.pic.twitter.com/jecKagnMGe
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The narrative section notes that is’s in relation to SACEUR forces so could be those countries in range/assigned to SACEUR? I didn’t look at it closely. Obviously if South Africa is on there then that’s an issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.