Okay I'm going to do something slightly unusual here. I'm finishing up my book manuscript right now, ACTIVE MEASURES (http://tinyletter.com/ridt ). One specific set of fact-checking questions is particularly hard—and related to US nuclear targeting in the early 1960s. Bear with me.
-
-
How many of the targets in the target encyclopedia that got purged post cold war were "just in case" contingency or in there for thoroughness? Could also be an aid for RISOP modeling?
-
No clue. A list by itself lacks context. The 1958 study had a section at the front that explained what it was trying to accomplish, etc.
-
...right! the 1956 study for 1959. (I'm gonna blame being on the road for mixed numbers!)
-
I just wanted to make sure I wasn't having another stroke or that I'd missed something fun.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(or such is how I interpret this bit) VN12 means they think it needs 12 psi to knock out. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb538-Cold-War-Nuclear-Target-List-Declassified-First-Ever/documents/section1.pdf …pic.twitter.com/VIZORSsSjy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
