Mattis reportedly told the commander of the Strategic Command to keep him directly informed of any event that might lead to a nuclear alert being sent to the president. He even told the commander “not to put on a pot of coffee without letting him know.”https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2018/12/23/trump-can-launch-nuclear-weapons-whenever-he-wants-with-or-without-mattis/ …
-
-
Replying to @MrDanZak
Anyone receiving an order to launch has the legal obligation to defy that order if they deem it is issued illegally.
6 replies 23 retweets 138 likes -
Unfortunately that is not true. It's the opposite, according to the article. Prez has sole authority. Somewhere in it article states "Anyone refusing order would be removed by Secret Service"
7 replies 5 retweets 36 likes -
Replying to @adambstrassberg @MrDanZak
The article is wrong. Every member of the US military - which includes people who turn the nuclear keys - is obligated per the UCoMJ to refuse an illegal order.
9 replies 14 retweets 121 likes -
Replying to @gainesm @adambstrassberg
Dan Zak Retweeted Drew Heineman
I refer you to someone who knows what they’re talking about:https://twitter.com/drewheineman/status/1076862518214123522?s=21 …
Dan Zak added,
Drew Heineman @drewheinemanReplying to @gainesm @adambstrassbergI do nuclear policy for Congress. There is an incredibly low probability that the CO of STRATCOM could determine in a very short timeframe that an order was illegal. I seriously doubt it unless the order was absolutely insane. It has never been tested/exercised.5 replies 9 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @MrDanZak @adambstrassberg
And? He literally stated my point - the order CAN be refused. Lol
4 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Really don't want to debate this on twitter again (we've done it several times already). An order is legal if it comes from the President. Full stop. All targeting plans have already been vetted through the lawyers to determine consistency with Law of Armed Conflict (1/2)
3 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
If Pres wants to launch an attack that hasn't been preplanned, and seems inconsistent with LOAC, then advisers might press him to change plan to one that is consistent with LOAC. But they can't/won't just say no. SFRC had a hearing on this folks, don't make me do this again.
5 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
I am very aware of NCA procedures, but if
@realDonaldTrump lost his mind & ordered a nuclear strike without justification, against LOAC, surely STRATCOM leaders could slow down the process, question the legitimacy of the order, etc? /22 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I think the "lost his mind" argument is the wrong one to have — it's the "easy" case for imagining STRATCOM would try to slow it down. The harder cases (bad info, limited use, an actual "aggression" from a power that does require some kind of counter) that are more troubling.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @Dr_M_Davis and
It’s happened more than once - on both sides. Luckily, even when officers had full authority to launch, they chose not to.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @Dr_M_Davis and
IOW where he is just too plain dumb to handle the crisis. Whish he'd be in EVERY conceivable crisis.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.