Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
wellerstein's profile
Alex Wellerstein
Alex Wellerstein
Alex Wellerstein
Verified account
@wellerstein

Tweets

Alex WellersteinVerified account

@wellerstein

Historian of science, secrecy, and nuclear weapons. Professor of STS at @FollowStevens. UC Berkeley alum with a Harvard PhD. NUKEMAP creator. Coder and web dev.

Hoboken, NJ / NYC
blog.nuclearsecrecy.com
Joined September 2011

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Alex Wellerstein‏Verified account @wellerstein 11 Dec 2018
    • Report Tweet

    US nuclear targeting category priorities in the USSR, 1972. Kind of fascinating/horrifying that urban/industrial is #1 priority even if Soviet nukes have not yet been launched at the US (e.g. if the US is launching a "preventative"/first-strike nuclear attack).pic.twitter.com/CLKlBOc8tH

    9:52 AM - 11 Dec 2018
    • 90 Retweets
    • 161 Likes
    • Centralia carol ( T_T) Julio Peña Deirdre Saoirse Moen Hrvoje Gradecak three-fingered fox, etc Dante M. Linares #CPT The Wife Files William Alberque
    12 replies 90 retweets 161 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Alex Wellerstein‏Verified account @wellerstein 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet

        I'm also kind of fascinated with this footnote, which seems to indicate that Gen. Tho. Power's "at the end of the war if there are two Americans and one Russian left alive, we win!" idea was actual policy at one point.pic.twitter.com/7hjJDlqVbY

        6 replies 19 retweets 38 likes
        Show this thread
      3. Alex Wellerstein‏Verified account @wellerstein 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet

        Full report is about giving the President more options — interesting mix-and-match categories of attack:pic.twitter.com/lCMWYvR1L5

        2 replies 13 retweets 17 likes
        Show this thread
      4. Alex Wellerstein‏Verified account @wellerstein 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet

        plus a little drawing... all in a day's work, I guesspic.twitter.com/rwBMNDY5dt

        1 reply 6 retweets 13 likes
        Show this thread
      5. Alex Wellerstein‏Verified account @wellerstein 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet

        Full report here: https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2013-051-doc1.pdf …

        3 replies 9 retweets 24 likes
        Show this thread
      6. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Robert Hopkins‏ @CobraBall3 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        #1 priority only for weapons planning allocation. Actual strikes would follow the order listed below (U/I areas are #3 and Task Charlie), beginning with the earlier BRAVO (blunting) mission and DELTA which eliminated Soviet war-making capability (hence U/I targeting).pic.twitter.com/9xgcN1Bkeb

        2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
      3. Alex Wellerstein‏Verified account @wellerstein 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @CobraBall3

        Right — as the part I included in the screenshot makes clear, this is about weapon allocation priority, not order of attack. Still plenty interesting that U/I gets the highest level of priority in both scenarios.

        2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
      4. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. Folks,‏ @pedatn 13 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        pic.twitter.com/w8NSwhpUvu

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Alex Wellerstein‏Verified account @wellerstein 13 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @pedatn @sovietvisuals

        From @DanielEllsberg's The Doomsday Machine, quoting John H. Rubel, former deputy director of defense research and engineering:pic.twitter.com/KKYuz7lD42

        0 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Gene Dannen‏ @GeneDannen 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        What I find most "fascinating/horrifying" about that document is that these are war crimes. http://www.dannen.com/decision/int-law.html …

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      3. Cristi‏ @Cristi15458088 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @GeneDannen @wellerstein

        Are we even talking about war crimes in a nuclear war, lol

        0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Scott Meikle‏ @oz_bassguy 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        Totally in line with description by @DanielEllsberg - there are no tactical nukes and no such thing as limited nuke exchange. I presume the same thinking still pervades current JCS planning? JCS nuke war planning was / is an absolute crazytown insane activity.

        1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
      3. Scott Meikle‏ @oz_bassguy 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @oz_bassguy @wellerstein @DanielEllsberg

        The fact that we are all still here is nothing short of an absolute miracle.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Janne M. Korhonen‏ @jmkorhonen 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        Good god. As noted already, that’s war crimes stuff right there.

        2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      3. Janne M. Korhonen‏ @jmkorhonen 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @jmkorhonen @wellerstein

        OfC nukular war isn’t very far from supreme crime against humanity, no matter which way you slice it.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      4.  🍎 🖥 🔥 🐣‏ @macphoenix 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @jmkorhonen @wellerstein

        Exactly. The politicians and military want to treat it as if it were extraordinary war, but within objective parameters—there would be winners and losers. Amazing after all this time, they still don’t understand that it’s existential.

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Allan Lyngs‏ @AllanLyngs 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        What does c^3 mean in this context?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Derek Lyons‏ @DerekL1963 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @AllanLyngs @wellerstein

        Command Control Communications = C^3.

        0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. stratDMZ‏ @stratDMZ 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        Priority 1 in both scenarios is crazy to imagine! Interesting that C3 infrastructure was not 1 in both cases - or how in pre-emption how strategic forces was not priority 1.

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. AtypicalDavid‏ @boxofzen 11 Dec 2018
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @wellerstein

        Residual general purpose....

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2019 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
      • Cookies
      • Ads info