This is interesting and counterintuitive — because of how the energy proportions itself (e.g. visible vs. infrared), kiloton-range nuclear weapons are brighter than megaton-range weapons, apparently.pic.twitter.com/AgRnRpBY8Y
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Poked around a bit and found these interesting diagrams (which are related to flash blindedness) which seem to indicate that indeed, lower-yield nuclear weapons are indeed brighter than higher-yield ones. Again, kind of an interesting and unintuitive fact.pic.twitter.com/EOBQ5n8xtL
Naively I would think higher energy density would correspond to higher temperature which should produce bluer emissions.
How about from the Moon?
With modern telescopes and instruments, we can see something as faint as 28 magnitude but we still can't detect a change in brightness of about 1 part in ~250 billion.
Clarke used that argument in that math trilogy/the grand galatics.
A 10 megaton blast could be a incoming object into the atmosphere. Isn't that something which orbiting detectors have to filter out? 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.