I admit I'm still confused as to what you're advocating one discuss when talking about nukes to the public — I see much of what you don't think we should be doing, and I thought I had inferred what you were advocating we talk about, but I'm now quite unsure.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
In my experience, unless people feel the nuclear issue is a personal one, they don't respond to it. The barriers for entry are huge. The wonky self-policing of technical language is huge. The structures of power seem very far away.
Emphasizing shared risk is one way to start the process of that kind of buy-in. It's the oldest way, anyway. But again, I'm interested in exploring other ways, too — that's a lot of what my RCD project is trying to look at: what actually gets people interested and involved?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.