I don't think it has to be an either/or thing — we either talk about the possibility of a nuclear detonation, or we talk about systemic violence and poverty. This seems like a false choice to me (and there is journalism about the latter, to be sure).
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
I admit I'm still confused as to what you're advocating one discuss when talking about nukes to the public — I see much of what you don't think we should be doing, and I thought I had inferred what you were advocating we talk about, but I'm now quite unsure.
-
-
To be specific: I can't tell if you're saying, "we should be engaging on these lines, not those lines," or "we shouldn't be engaging at all on this issue." If the former, I'm curious about the lines you think would be more productive.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.