Thanks. I do, depending on the context, try to steer into questions that I wish people were asking — e.g., whether the cost of modernization is justified, what else we could spend the money on. But it doesn't always happen and it rarely makes it into a final piece.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
There is a separate question about strategy, e.g., does talking about the damage serve as a hook to get people to care about the issue, which can then result in policy engagement? In my experience this is true, but this is also being studied.
(E.g., Does framing nukes in terms of social justice get a stronger response — esp. with younger voters — than framing them in terms of the "circles of death"? I don't know. This is an empirical question, not quite yet answered to my satisfaction, but we're looking into it.)
-
-
Anyway, I appreciate your comments.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I admit I'm still confused as to what you're advocating one discuss when talking about nukes to the public — I see much of what you don't think we should be doing, and I thought I had inferred what you were advocating we talk about, but I'm now quite unsure.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.