You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The same cannot be said in many other scientific fields... I don't really get why the self-appointed stalwarts of objectivity don't spend as much time talking about how industrial funding taints scientific inquiry as they do small postmodernist studies.
I think there are many more methodological issues (p-hacking, replicability crises, lack of progress in some fields despite huge investments, etc.) that one can look at before worrying if a postmodern journal has a methodology that would satisfy Karl Popper.
(Which is why I tend to conclude that the people who think postmodernism is the enemy of science are either being disingenuous or just being foolish.)
(And to be very clear: I have never heard of any of the journals targeted, and I don't read their scholarship or put any particular value on it. But I think a "troll-based" approach to methodology — which is what I think hoaxing is — is not at all productive or interesting.)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
