You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I was sort of being facetious. I know the line and the models. I’m just confused why they are referring to a nuclear yield event euphemistically here. And following a yield event, it’ll be utter pandemonium and my instinct is to account for that rather than hope ppl will stay in.
I don't think we have good models for what people will actually do in this situation. (Or, at least, I don't trust any of the assumptions made by the models out there.) But I do think we can think about what we'd like them to do — and work on that behavior modification.
I don’t disagree. But trivializing the magnitude and significance of the event makes behavioral modification difficult
(Which is what we do for earthquakes, tornadoes, tsunamis, hurricanes, even nuclear power plant emergencies for communities nearby. And what we used to do for nuclear weapons...)
The problem with the way it is currently being done is that occasionally the gov't will put out some "get inside stay inside stuff," but it's not really done in an impactful way. Research by my colleagues here suggests that vast majority of Americans are not familiar with phrase.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
