I don't recall seeing any explanation of why they used WC in LB instead of U, though they also studied U. My guess (half-memory?) is that they were worried about excess neutrons in the core causing predetonation possibilities. U has a real background neutron rate, WC does not.
-
-
So I have a declassed doc on this in which that sentence is redacted but it’s obviously what is said re: neutrons from natrl U. Let me get out of class and I will send.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NuclearAnthro @wellerstein and
Martin “Doomsday” Pfeiffer (⧖) 🏳️🌈 Retweeted Martin “Doomsday” Pfeiffer (⧖) 🏳️🌈
https://twitter.com/nuclearanthro/status/935011250811035649?s=21 … It’s from one of the glasstone classed docs on nukes. Will get full citation later.
Martin “Doomsday” Pfeiffer (⧖) 🏳️🌈 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
So much math in nuclear physics If only it was easier to calculate Z in my back yard breeder reactor shielding. Half of that statement is true I hate math and skipped half of Glasstone because it was using Greek symbols
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @ScottCarson1945 @NuclearAnthro and
The only word I understood was conference
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @ScottCarson1945 @Mk2Salamnder and
Going back to Nat or DU tamper/reflector for gun bombs - avoiding predetonation in gun weapons simplifies as a game of removing U-238 from the system. A U-238 tamper is obviously counterproductive...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GeorgeWHerbert @Mk2Salamnder and
(Why obviously counterproductive? I mean, you would at least get some U-238 fissioning, like they did in FM. I'm not disagreeing, just not understanding why "obviously" in this case.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @Mk2Salamnder and
The U-238 is a low rate constant neutron source from its spontaneous fission. Tamper quantities almost guarantee predetonation at realistic gun bombs assembly timeframes. Implosion assembles / inserts orders of magnitude faster, with much higher velocity and shorter distances.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
OK, that's what I thought, but was curious if there were other reasons.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.