Oppenheimer admitted in sworn testimony to lying to security officers, to having an affair with a known Communist while he was director of Los Alamos, and to appointing people he knew were Communists to key positions at the lab.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @ColdWarScience
I'm not saying he deserved the hearing, which was indeed a farce (punctuated by illegal things like Strauss and the FBI wiretapping his confidential conversations with his lawyer), but it's more than "they didn't like his political opinions." The guy did some legit sketchy stuff!
4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @ColdWarScience
Forgive me butting in here but do you have a view as to whether he had ever been a CP member, as per Gregg Herkin's work? Clearly the FAECT stuff was quite close.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JAFMacDonald @ColdWarScience
The most that anyone has ever accused him of being was of being some kind of off-the-books, non-card-carrying, non-CP-discipline-following secret member. I don't really think that counts as being a member; that's just being a fellow-traveler in my book.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @ColdWarScience
Fair enough. Haynes & Klehr say 'secret member', based on Herken, but it's rather indeterminate. I'm writing about Frank O & Caltech's Unit 122 which was essentially a closed cell yet much more than fellow travelling.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JAFMacDonald @ColdWarScience
JRO himself clearly saw what Frank was doing as something far further — he expressed extreme disapproval. It's very hard to imagine JRO becoming a true member of the CP, in part because of the party discipline stuff. JRO wasn't a discipline kind of guy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Did he have lots of connections with CP members and raise money for CP causes and probably fake his way through conversations on CP issues over martinis? Sure. Does that make you a member of CPUSA? Not in my book, and not in the book of the FBI, either.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Being in CO without my library, I'm unable to re-read what Bird & Sherwin say about this. I recall Herken making a more extreme claim. What stood out for me in both books - being a CP member or fell trav meant different things in 1935 vs 1950
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Both rely heavily on Chevalier's later recollections, which are sketchy and can be interpreted different ways. Chevalier said that it was more of a "discussion group" than a "closed unit."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @LeapingRobot and
Chevalier says JRO never paid any dues, and it was only 6 or 7 people, they took no orders, and did not think of themselves as CP members. He is impressively vague on what it was or wasn't: "We both were and were not." I rank that as fellow traveler, personally.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
For me all this comes down to is 1) JRO wasn't perjuring himself in any real way when he claimed he wasn't a CP member, and 2) they never took any orders/discipline so who cares anyway? Beyond that I think it just becomes kind of academic semantics.
-
-
I recall Bird & Sherwin + others also making the "ultimately, why does the CP membership matter in the end now" point. That's the line I take when teaching the topic with the more relevant question being "why did it matter then?"
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.