When you are empire you write pages upon pages about nuking a place and use words like "interesting" and "favorite" - no moral quandaries.https://twitter.com/wellerstein/status/1027546489302798337 …
1. I'm a historian. I write pages upon pages about lots of things that happened in the past. It's literally my job. I wonder what you're prefer the alternative to be — ignoring things? 2. "Interesting" means "worth studying, thinking about, looking at." Not "good."
-
-
3. I said the piece I wrote was my "favorite piece of writing." It was a very intentionally-written piece, one in which I try to paint a picture that doesn't moralize much, but nonetheless makes a moral argument. I think it came off well. Read it before you judge it.
-
4. If you think I'm trying to glorify, trivialize, or even justify the bombing of Nagasaki, then you clearly aren't reading closely enough. I know it's easy to be trivial and flip on Twitter — I've done it myself at times — but it's not the road to understanding.
-
thank you for your notes. I indeed read the piece before tweeting, and found it fascinating. still, there is much unease to be noted in how the death of us non-westerners is talked about, too casually.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“The holocaust was an interesting phenomenon. It was exceptionally well-executed & well-planned, more so than other genocides.”
-
Yes this is exactly what I am referring to. One does not need to compare atrocities to compare how the consequences and victims are spoken of.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.