There seems to be a lot confusion in the replies here regarding what Audra is saying — which is an entirely uncontroversial statement within the academic disciplines that study how science works now and in the past (e.g., the History, Anthropology, & Sociology of Science).https://twitter.com/ColdWarScience/status/1017211382176059392 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @wellerstein
Good discussion, but I did think the original tweet a bit simplistic. In what way was Einstein's search for a theory of space and time political? In what way was the search for a general theory of relativity political?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CormacORafferty
Cormac, finding the political context of relativity — especially GR — is not that hard... I am sure you know this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Stark …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
That is not the political context of the serach for GR. That is the political context of one man's reaction to GR
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CormacORafferty
Re-read the article again Cormac... "It was Stark who, as the editor of Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik, asked in 1907, then still rather unknown, Albert Einstein to write a review article on the principle of relativity. ..."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And anyway you're misunderstanding the definition of political. But here's an easy hint: if people have strong political responses to science, then it's hard to argue that there isn't something political going on. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Physik …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.