My hopes for the summit: if the US and DPRK can get into a position that reassures both leaders to the point where they are unlikely to blunder into war anytime soon, then I'll call it a success. It's a low bar, but I'll take it.
-
Show this thread
-
Failure would be a total breakdown and return to hostile conditions, or with the US and DPRK walking away with unworkable "deal" that is based on misunderstanding or deception. Both of which are (unfortunately) within the possible imagination.
1 reply 3 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
My prediction is that they will commit to a vague, non-verifiable, no-timeline idea of disarmament, and all parties will declare it a success if the talks don't just breakdown immediately. If it decreases chances of war, I'm OK with that, even if it's not a real "fix."
1 reply 13 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @chrisjennings46
The US has managed to have productive (or at the very least, non-war) interactions with dictators in the past, for better and worse. I would take that over a war, personally.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I mean, most dictators tend to be evil to their own people. Saying "I don't think we should blunder into a war with them, and if this keeps us from doing that, I'll be OK with that" should not be a hugely controversial statement. It's not an endorsement of Kim or Trump.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.