Definitely not against experimenting with certain kinds of wealth redistribution (e.g. UBI), but it's weird that these convos sometimes start with "which policy should we use to make the wealthy less wealthy?" rather than "which policy should we use to make the poor less poor?"
Like, in the sense that if you've secured the funding, you're golden, and you can work out the details later?
-
-
There’s risk in letting a rising tide lift all boats. If you can’t handle potential negative externalities of that you want to only manage downside risk, not take risks with more upside. Assuming the pie will get bigger is an inherent risk.
-
I wonder how much of it is true risk aversion and how much is concluding from lived experience rather than data that the pie just *isn't* growing, whatever the wonks say
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.