Just in general, "like, whaaaat" to *all* models that feel internally coherent but have components that individually explain way too much before they're even out of the gatehttps://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/980780687828557824 …
-
Not central, but one that comes to mind is all the prenatal/maternity advice whereby a thousand common/default behaviors will with great likelihood cause severe damage to the baby. The rub is that you'd expect a lot more messed up babies if a fraction of these claims were true
Yep (but I wouldn't pick on any one dietary theory in particular & I'm confused here, too). Nutrition seems relevant to many outcomes, but the evidence simultaneously suggests that humans are amazingly adaptable wrt diet & there are SO many more environmental factors to consider
-
-
Re: other factors — I was actually just chatting with some friends about my intuition that a "poor diet, great sleep" version of me would outperform a "great diet, poor sleep" version across most long-term outcomes. Most agreed. Sleep hygiene seems neglected relative to nutrition
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.