Near-universally, the coolest people I know think about the Things You Can’t Say *all the time*. They’re not confident that charitably-interpreted mainstream views are wrong, but can’t take it on faith. From an outsider’s perspective, they’re playing with social matches.
-
-
Consider people like Julia Galef who talk about lots of third rail stuff but don't get negative reactions to the scale that he does. There's a way to handling these topics without giving other truth-seeking & compassionate people the impression that you're peddling pseudoscience
-
Where do you think Julia has touched the third rail? I think she pretty explicitly avoids issues people find too toxic to engage with charitably
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Well said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same-- being a brown woman I am given more leeway with what I can say. I try to put it to good use by discussing controversial issues openly.
-
It also helps if you are articulate, which I strive to be. I'm reminded of an old LW article: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/pZSpbxPrftSndTdSf/honesty-beyond-internal-truth …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You’re right that there’s a false dichotomy but I don’t think people like Sam Harris are above they frey on it. To me the problem isn’t people railing against PC or people being exclusionary with identity. It’s both parties being assholes about it.
-
Those pushing identity politics are right in that we need to check privilege and be more aware. But the other group is right that identity people are being exclusionary and paint with over broad brushes. What we need is assuming positive intent and a partnership to help others.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.