Bay area NIMBY rhetoric is so firmly yoked to anti-tech sentiment that I expect the data privacy panic to make it even harder for housing advocates to gain ground. But young, single tech talent can pay their $3300/mo rent & they'll still be here at $4000+. So who will have to go?
-
-
I'm sure there is *some* cost of living so high that even the VCs and VC-backed tech startups that actually matter wouldn't be able to hold their noses anymore. But the region would lose *every other kind* of young/new resident first
Show this thread -
NIMBY rests on fear/disgust at recent change, but the static housing supply only exacerbates these changes. Every move brings another rent-controlled unit back up to market. Long-term renters can't afford to move freely, so they're at the mercy of terrible jobs or worse commutes
Show this thread -
Frankly, if you're making things work with a small rent-controlled apartment paying the market rate 7 or 8 years ago, it would be really unwise to find your soulmate. Really, how would you make that work? Visiting friends wonder where all the babies and dogs are.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.