You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I’ve been thinking a lot about how concerned I am with shifting norms around political disagreement — especially where saying something, casting a vote, etc. is perceived as *actual* violence & therefore ought to be responded to as though it were truly violent behavior.
Media is definitely complicit. I’m tempted by “we accept narratives uncritically when we’re cued to rage against someone,” but this isn’t a necessary motive. Even blind algorithms will feed us stories likely to make us angry! We click on those more often.
The way we consume our news (filtered just for us, tailored to the most recent snapshot of our online activity) can only exacerbate this. News Co X isn’t competing against an adversarial narrative; its content has to be tastier than the *same* narrative presented by someone else.
The rage cues are outcompeting one another toward refinement just as any material we could use to understand our ideological opponents is removed from view. When we do see the “enemy” talk, we’re out for blood.
(@EricRWeinstein is a national treasure for thinking and talking about this, and especially for encouraging us all to *notice our own confusion* even when the how and why aren't clear.)
Preach 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
