IMO, extreme risk aversion (probably prompted by very salient edge cases) has swung the Overton window right off its hinges when it comes to thinking about the sort of challenges and risks that are acceptable for children at different developmental stages.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Re: a 12-year-old flying unsupervised (from security to the gate/plane & back): what's the fear? That she'll actually be hurt? That she'll make poor decisions, e.g. buying candy for lunch or not doing homework? That she'll get scared/overwhelmed?
Show this thread -
It's *really* important that we nail these goal posts down, because as long as we're using "kids can't be put in danger" to defend *actually* sheltering them from any discomfort or bad decision-making, we can't have a real conversation about whether that might be hobbling them.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems likely. Lots of interesting facets to this. I wonder how a relatively expensive private healthcare market factors in. The framework wrt liability is bizarre; I can't think of many indoor spaces safer than airports!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When school districts have this kind of policy for middle school students (11-14 years old) it becomes a problem for anyone else to trust that kids in that age group are capable of doing anything without holding an adult's hand.pic.twitter.com/zZt5OMKBGX
-
What board is that?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.