If you aren't worried re: technological job loss, you probably either underestimate ML or overestimate the competence of your government.
-
Show this thread
-
There might be some frog-boiling going on re: e.g. self-driving cars. We're familiar w/ the concept but don't fully grok the economic shock.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Things will be safer, cheaper, better. But the value of most human labor will drop to ~$0/hr, and we are woefully unprepared to adapt.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
That's why workers will move to sectors where their contribution is >$0/hr.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gruenatodes
If you think there will be many of those, or that they will grow rather than shrink, I think you probably underestimate machine learning
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason
If 250 years of technology-driven economic growth and sectoral change are any guide: Yes there will be
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Unless ML represents a genuine sea change, which I think it almost certainly does. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.