If you aren't worried re: technological job loss, you probably either underestimate ML or overestimate the competence of your government.
Show this thread
-
There might be some frog-boiling going on re: e.g. self-driving cars. We're familiar w/ the concept but don't fully grok the economic shock.
Show this thread
Things will be safer, cheaper, better. But the value of most human labor will drop to ~$0/hr, and we are woefully unprepared to adapt.
-
-
That's why workers will move to sectors where their contribution is >$0/hr.
-
If you think there will be many of those, or that they will grow rather than shrink, I think you probably underestimate machine learning
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ever read Manna? Most human labor just becomes following instructions from an ML “manager”: http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm
-
I do think "unskilled labor will go first" isn't a great assumption. Losses will prob follow the cost-of-human to ease-of-automation ratio.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.