Will this incentivize outlets to withhold information about the source of materials they publish/report on? Broadly, investigative reporting relies heavily on documents provided by people who aren't authorized to access or share them
-
-
Show this thread
-
Would this not apply to virtually *all* industry/government whistleblowers?https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1316525307441147907 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mason, as you know, they do not care.
-
Mason’s arguing from a position of good faith, instead of basing her judgement on their historic actions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
To his credit,
@jack seems to have thrown his team under the bus on this one -
Jack is busy running a dozen other companies right now - hard for home to be on top of this one publicly traded company the leader of the free world uses to communicate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It seems like this is how we want sites responding to likely fake news drops. There isn't a clear solution you can codify for all situations, so the next best thing is to block likely hoaxes with high risk. It's easy enough to undo it later if needed.
-
Plus, I'd rather them outright ban content in a transparent way than shadow banning it. I know that shadow banning is a common and legitimate way to address malicious users on all social sites, but it's been politicized in a way that makes it a bad approach here.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
When it's blatantly false...https://twitter.com/danielsgoldman/status/1316357178018738177?s=20 …
-
How are the emails and wire transfers false? Why is a VP's son is receiving $50k a month to serve on a gas company's board, and $3.5 million from a Putin insider? Is he being paid for his skills or for access to dad? Pretending this isn't a thing requires cult-level denial.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.