This reads hyperbolic to me. They mean they trust that process, rather than "bible say no abortion" or whatever. Maybe its metal AF in the abstract but when I picture a breakthrough I imagine someone in their 60s with reading glasses on turning a journal page and saying "neat".
-
-
-
Then read some more biographies
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
One of the most surprising things I learnt in a philosophy of science class college is that scientists can be as dogmatic, or more, than religious types. Its eye opening how purveyors of debunked theories held onto them in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.
-
Yep. Planck's aphorism that "science advances one funeral at a time" is quite accurate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I tend to respond with “ which science and whose science??”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To my eye, the whole point of science is that it's not something that demands belief. Once someone wants you to believe in science, it's actually scientism. (Stated as controversially as possible)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of the cruelest lives is that of the scientist who dies penniless and their theories ridiculed.. who turned out to be right
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's often said as a cop out counter to philosophical or intuitive analysis, as if believing unequivocally in Science is not a dogmatic religion in itself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's shorthand for "I believe the best course of action is the one that is most consistent with current scientific evidence "
-
For some people, sure. In my experience, it’s shorthand for “I’m on the smart-people side.”
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.