You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Mao kitsch is a permanent part of American pop art, and it is ubiquitous. So is Soviet kitsch. Nazi kitsch isn't. These are background facts. Many teenagers across the Western world have Che t-shirts.
I can't say I think Mao kitsch is "ubiquitous," but insofar as it is I think it's perfectly reasonable and probably somewhat morally obligatory to ask why anyone is comfortable with that.
I don't disagree. But someone flaunting a swastika is violating very strong norms intentionally, and sending a strong message. In contrast, someone wearing a skirt with pop art images, including one of Mao, is simply replicating styles ubiquitous on American college campuses.
So claiming that wearing a skirt with pop art images one of which is Mao is on a par with wearing a swastika is just false. They communicate entirely different things. What you are arguing - reasonably - is that we should change those norms. That's not the context of the tweet.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
