If he was an employee, there’s no way his employer would have let him work that much.
-
-
-
Exactly. At best, he'd be stuck juggling 2-3 part-time jobs and basically begging for merciful scheduling to make that work on a day-to-day basis, something I saw plenty of when I was waitressing and working retail
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know so many people who work like this. They’ll put in 12+ hour days for several months, then disappear for a month. I managed an outdoor space for years and this is how all the staff did it. The flexibility is gold.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lowering our standards to where 12 hour days w/out benefits etc look like a good idea, doesn't actually make them a good deal.
-
Nor does it make it a good idea to use the force of legislation to ban it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I have no idea what you believe in, but you pick the most fringe nonsense to amplify during a time when we are ACTUALLY living in the apocalypse. I’m still trying to figure out Twitter...I might be doing it wrong.
-
the quoted Lorena Gonzalez introduced AB5
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is NIMBY, but for how people can work instead of where people can live.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one appears to be pointing out thay he must have considerable car expenses. I doubt the net is very good. He's probably not working a bunch then going on a long vacation.
-
yeah, shame on cnbc. they should be transparent and offer "a full breakdown of his expenses"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.