It's fine to be uncomfortable with the endgame for an extremely permissive sexual culture. It's also fine to be uncomfortable rolling it back. But this isn't about the algorithms, it's about you having your nose rubbed in your own "values." https://twitter.com/hunterwalk/status/1292104730181636097 …
-
-
What I'd like is for us to drag these conversations into daylight and actually talk about what we want and what we don't want, without insisting that every mixed outcome of our preferred ideals is somebody else's fault.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ugh you're probably right. I don't want to go the dystopian route but if we absolutely must, can we at least find a way to oppress men this time? Just to shake things up
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Quietly: one of the problems with “patriarchy” as a theory is that it tends to hide the relatively greater religiosity of women relative to men in the past, and thus also the degree to which women have approved of policing each other’s sexuality, as modern polling date supports.
-
When this is addressed it turns out "patriarchy" is defined so broadly as a system enforced by men and women and hurts men and women to help some men and some women.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At least when the religious do it they do it in public or 1:1, he wants code to enforce his beliefs for everybody(1B+) in private. What could go wrong?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*busts in* what the hell is going on here, this is all wrong. *20 yrs later* well actually..pic.twitter.com/68KiaXf5UO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.