You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
People seem a lot better off when the ways they give help and receive help are fluid and generally nonmonetary, such that they don't have to allow themselves to be bilked by consistent game-players or feel like they're a "drain" on some system themselves
Disclaimer: most things/services that people need can be bought with money. Trade is not bad. Money is not bad. Donating money is not bad. It's very good! I just think a lot of people are running up against the challenges of overly explicitly/scalably organizing social primates
I feel like you are disguising your point in code "overly explicitly/scalably organizing social primates"...or I'm just sort of dumb;)
I'm trying to avoid misinterpretation, but maybe just making myself hard to read. What I mean is that people are working with a lot of social animal hardware that evolved in small groups, and we're prone to think we can ignore that stuff to create material solutions that scale
I don't think this is solvable with either "community" or "religion". - People need to move for jobs (and "education") enough that even extended families don't stick together in a socially satisfying way. - Replacement-religions have voluntary membership, thus they can't extract%
much from their members to support their less-lucky fellows who are socially strangers. However, there are a few ways to build these on a basis that makes walking-away less common: * filter membership based on persistent traits; * provide something else of value. %
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
