Lobotomy won the Nobel Prize less than a century ago. Keyword: António Egas Moniz https://twitter.com/brnzmn/status/1286344815026884618 …
-
-
Imagine. Just imagine swirling a human being's brains for the *third* time. If she hadn't died shortly thereafter, this practice for managing uncooperative family members may well have continued.
Show this thread -
Google this. Search it. Redisover the history, here. Lobotomized people live on today.
Show this thread -
The fact that we no longer do this to people is a true godsend. But we could easily revert. It's critical that we fully understand the nature of the error.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
THIRD?!?! What could you possibly hope to be gaining from an additional lobotomy? Isn't it basically a permanent off switch?
-
An almost-off-switch may very well be what someone would want. The hope generally was that it would result in a submissive doormat (initially replacing an agenty and disrespectful person). Indeed this outcome did happen sometimes, so if a first try left something else instead…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Trepanations were from centuries ago though. Front lobotomies occurred within the last 70 years.
End of conversation
-
-
-
A President's sister had one performed on her.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, we're much more civilized now. We just use pharmaceuticals and call it "medicine" instead of poking metal rods to destroy someone's brain.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.