If at any point you repeated or boosted the "fact" that masks should not be worn to prevent the spread of coronavirus — knowing or suspecting that this was an unsupported claim to reduce demand for PPE — you have no business shaping or promoting mask policy/messaging now.
-
-
we are all measured by our follower count?
-
No? I was pointing out that both her claim to expertise and her scope of influence was greater than mine
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are weirdly studies and meta studies that show both outcomes. But they aren’t clear as to whether or not the infectious people were wearing masks or not. All seem to be done in healthcare settings too. Not sure if/how that translates to everyday life.
-
The study/analysis I think you're referencing was, sadly, trash. It was lauded as the gold standard because it was supposedly a randomized controlled trial, but the control group was so ill-defined that it was impossible to know what the interventions were even compared against
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
don't forget the amazing health officials and reps who told us to go out in mass crowds as late as mid-march. let's also not forget all the mayors who showed up at mass protests and did so without any masks. for most people - its all become a farce at this point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I had a similar interaction with an epidemiologist on FB. He was totally snarky about it too. Literally said masks would increase infections "because science."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Canada's highest ranking health official also peddled this misinformation, that wearing a mask increased risk of infection, in addition to assuring Canadians there was no community spread because absence of evidence was treated as evidence of absence.
-
And of course, theres zero accountability when the 180 is done. Its always "new evidence emerged", that it was the science that was wrong and not the scientist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You gotta tag that epidemiologist!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fool me once? Shame on you. Fool me twice? Shame on me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.