It would be helpful to shift the focus here a little bit. People seem divided over whether we should be concerned for the people who are cancelled. But the higher order concern is for all of us. The world suffers when ideas can't be shared freely.
Yes, you don't *technically* have blood on your hands if you see to it that your enemies are starved rather than bludgeoned.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1281165077975048192 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet demonstrates some real literary genius. 
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Although extreme I see your point. Yet, I'm not sure how fair this comparison is. "Blood on one's hands" is a well-known idiom but what Paul speaks of is not. I feel like that makes the conditions for literalness sufficiently different.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All I see is more speech. The original statement, the attempted "cancelling" statements in response, the criticisms of the cancelling statements, the criticisms of the criticisms of the cancelling statements, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.