Why would anyone use Clubhouse again knowing that anything you say, even in an unguarded moment, can be recorded and used to cancel you? It's like Russian roulette with a microphone
-
if it's just an individual in a different state California can't just assume jurisdiction.
This question was the entire basis of the SC case, and the ruling determined "that the complaint was properly governed by California law" and could be prosecuted in CA despite the recording party calling from Georgia.
-
-
"The California decision confirms that states with restrictive eavesdropping laws will not hesitate to enforce those laws against interstate callers."
-
I get it, I'm just saying that I highly doubt this law applies to individuals. As I said I agree that it can apply to companies because they usually have a local entity that you can legally serve.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.