Why would anyone use Clubhouse again knowing that anything you say, even in an unguarded moment, can be recorded and used to cancel you? It's like Russian roulette with a microphone
-
Actually, I think your first point might be wrong. “A good rule of thumb is that the law of the jurisdiction in which the recording device is located will apply,” Matthiesen Wickert & Lehrer says.https://www.rev.com/blog/phone-call-recording-laws-state …
It's at least true for CA, where the state supreme court specifically ruled on the issue in 2006https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/california-two-party-consent-law-applies-to-recording-of-calls-made-from-other-states.html …
-
-
Just because the California supreme court creates a law does not mean it has jurisdiction over the case. When a business does business in multiple states it registers an entity in the state which means it can be sued locally even the recording happened in a one party state but
-
if it's just an individual in a different state California can't just assume jurisdiction.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.