Why would anyone use Clubhouse again knowing that anything you say, even in an unguarded moment, can be recorded and used to cancel you? It's like Russian roulette with a microphone
If the recorded speech is taking place in a two-party consent state — including CA, where many Clubhouse members are located — the person recording can be prosecuted regardless of where they're physically located. The critical issue is whether or not CH convos are "confidential"
-
-
Actually, I think your first point might be wrong. “A good rule of thumb is that the law of the jurisdiction in which the recording device is located will apply,” Matthiesen Wickert & Lehrer says.https://www.rev.com/blog/phone-call-recording-laws-state …
-
It's at least true for CA, where the state supreme court specifically ruled on the issue in 2006https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/california-two-party-consent-law-applies-to-recording-of-calls-made-from-other-states.html …
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I honestly don't know which way that breaks with something like Clubhouse (as it currently operates). A very large number of people can be involved in those calls, but they all still have to be individually invited in order to participate
-
The standard is "reasonable expectation of privacy". The name of the app is "club house". I think you can win on that front.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.