I *really* take issue with any argument that people shouldn't be able to talk with whomever they like at whatever level of privacy they like. Freedom of association isn't contingent on anyone's ideas about "accountability."
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
It’s funny. It very clearly reads as I was happy and writing positively because I was the only journalist on it (and that’s special access) but now that I feel I need my tribe you’re excluding journalists on purpose and I will write to shame you. Because screw logic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When things don’t go their way the only strategy left is tantrum
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Throwing a hissy fit over not enough journos being allowed in while making tacit threats to use journalism to give them bad press is just perfect
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The more impossible / costly we make public conversation, the more we’ll see private fragmentation. This is but one of many emerging examples of our more general societal disintegration / systemic lock-in of social bulk-heading due to poorly designed digital communication spaces.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We should all have reps with full access to NYTs Slack. Unless they have something to hide
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The most disturbing thing about this is that this is a *journalist* and doesn’t know how to use the apostrophe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cry baby
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.