We weren't talking about "the public interest," we were talking about what one's clients should know about the external lives of the people they work with. Why would that also be contingent on having a large following? There's no consistency here, just "yes for me, no for thee."
Scott accidentally fomenting revolt within the NYT just by being the most perfect innocent cinnamon roll nobody can stand to see harmed is my everythinghttps://twitter.com/karolkarpinski/status/1276220747468414977 …
-
-
-
We don't need to know SSC's exact conflicts of interests to judge the quality of his work, or to judge the veracity of his assertions. We can just read his articles and judge them by the merits of their evidence and arguments.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don't understand why anyone frames much of anything in terms of what is "deserved" rather than what's pragmatic and sensible in the interest of a society where good ideas can live in the public domain prior to absolutely perfect consensus over them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty rich coming from a pseudonymous account tbh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why should your coworkers' and clients' right to find everything you've ever written be a function of how many people think you're worth listening to?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Insofar as Scott talks about working w patients, I've only ever seen him explicitly use fictionalized vignettes. To break confidentiality would be a much bigger issue. Would I want to know if my own doctor fictionalized an account based on me? Sure. Am I entitled to that? No.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Legal standards pertaining to defamation are totally orthogonal to the conversation here, and if it weren't incredibly self-serving I doubt you'd even bring it up. Consider for one second the implications of selectively ruining only people whose ideas are well-read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love to see employee advocacy at big tech companies
-
Sassy Neeraj is best Neeraj
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“Don’t pick fights with people who buy ink by the barrel” still very much applies Problem is the newsroom still thinks they’re the ones buying wholesale
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.