You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
For someone who is intentionally pseudonymous? I'd say yes -- but same question applies even if you prefer a different word.
People often use pseudonyms when, yes, their real names are pointers for things like "physical street address and suite # where I work 5 days/week" and "direct line to person who cuts my paycheck." If you don't understand the implications here, you've no business as a journalist.
His pseudonym is a pointer to his real name and has been for 15+ years https://twitter.com/kirindave/status/1275567624139624448?s=21 …https://twitter.com/KirinDave/status/1275567624139624448 …
I'm sorry, but if your'e asking folks to have sympathy for the position that Scott should be protected from the consequences of writing in defense of widely discredited books like "The Bell Curve" because that's damaging financially, you have picked the wrong year.
Folks have known Scott's name for a long time now. It's been trivial to google from any permutation of his real name and pseudonym for a long time now. He has not "been cancelled" even to the limited extent folks like Yarvin have. So this risk profile offered also seems fishy.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
